Bad news for the Goracle

This year is going to be one of the coldest on record.  With record colds in the Southern Hemisphere reaching new lows and snow in some parts that have not seen snow in over 50 years.  But that doesn’t stop the Goracle and his Disciples. They just had a big shindig at Bali and were chastising the US over Kyoto and "climate change". 
And now scientists are saying that the Sun activity is at its lowest they’ve seen in years.  Hmm   I wonder how that could be???  Maybe the climate has something to do with the SUN.

Year of global cooling

By David Deming

December 19, 2007

Al Gore says global warming is a planetary emergency. It is
difficult to see how this can be so when record low temperatures are
being set all over the world. In 2007, hundreds of people died, not
from global warming, but from cold weather hazards.

Since the
mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7
degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well
within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to
build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn’t
increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting
colder. Neither the intensity nor the frequency of hurricanes has
increased. The 2007 season was the third-quietest since 1966. In 2006
not a single hurricane made landfall in the U.S.

South
America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In
Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918. Dozens
of homeless people died from exposure. In Peru, 200 people died from
the cold and thousands more became infected with respiratory diseases.
Crops failed, livestock perished, and the Peruvian government declared
a state of emergency.

Unexpected bitter cold swept the entire
Southern Hemisphere in 2007. Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first
significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest
June ever. In northeastern Australia, the city of Townsville underwent
the longest period of continuously cold weather since 1941. In New
Zealand, the weather turned so cold that vineyards were endangered.

Last
January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a
devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were
thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the
wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked
President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A
few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool
the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for
similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

— Washington Times

And please if anybody does find Manbearpig, please call the Goracle right away.  He is cereal.

Call the Wambulance

So, the US finally agreed to the "consensus" at Bali after this blubbering idiot cried about how the world is coming to an end.  Call the wambulance.  If they think that CO2 is such a problem, maybe they should not have flown half way around the world to Bali.  They put out more CO2 that the City of St. Louis does in a year to get all the attendees there.  What hypocrisy.  All this to cut CO2 admissions, which CO2 is the giver of life to us.  Without CO2, we would not feed the world and we would not be able to live on Earth. 
And what of this "consensus"???   Every day we have more and more real climatologists saying that man has nothing to do with Manbearpig.  The Earth has cycles of war and cold climates, and it has a lot ot do with that big Fireball in the sky we call the Sun.  And scientists have discovered that most of the warming and cooling has to do with Sunsopts, Solar Flares and the angle of the Earth compared to the Sun.  But we got the Goracle deriding the US because we don’t drink the cool-aid of the New Church of Manbearpig.  I am sick and tired of the UN and the rest of the beuaroweenies taking over our sovereignty.  If the EU and the rest of the world wants to tax themselves into  ruination, let them, just leave the US alone and let us live the way we want to.  We are a sovereign country,  not the United Nations of America.    We should never let any body take over our sovereignty, that is why we had the Boston tea Party.  I think that the UN should be booted out of the US and let them reside in EU and then let them control the EU economy and fall off to the wayside.  The UN is nothing more than a platform for all the 3rd world Dictators to blather on about how bad the US and Israel are, not looking at their own countries faults. 
Thanks to our great leaders we are now going to have to accept this overtaking of our sovereign country to the Beauroweenies at the UN.  When is enough enough????  when are we going to take bakc our country from these Beauroweenies and bring our country back to what it was before the UN became the Shadow Government.??? 

And the Goracle is still looking for Manbearpig.  If you see him give the Goracle a call.

Bali Conference not a High for Algore

Bali didn’t turn out too badly for the US.  Here’s a final report from the First Things blog:

The Bali Conference Is Over (Whew!)

Posted by Thomas Sieger Derr on December 16, 2007, 4:07 PM

After pulling a dramatic all-nighter, delegates at the U.N. conference on climate change left beautiful, lush Bali for the real world with an agreed text on their laptops. Those of us who follow these matters were not the least bit surprised at the result: U.N. officials and others who wanted an international consensus for greenhouse-gas emissions spoke glowingly of success. All delegations signed on, and the text looks forward to eventual deep emissions cuts.

But the realists and the environmentalists (including Al Gore, who flew in to denounce the U.S., to wild applause) were bitterly disappointed, saying that nothing really had changed. Why? Because their hope was for agreement on specific targets, a 25–40 percent cut. They fought and nearly bled for that to get into the final text, but the United States held out against naming specific targets and won. Its delegate was roundly booed until she agreed to sign a consensus statement and theoretically join “the process”— but without targets.

The U.S. carried the burden of the villain but was actually backed by Canada and Japan, as I reported in my Daily Article on this website a few days ago. Australia, trying to find its identity under its new government, also apparently does not want targets. And there’s a report, unconfirmed, that Russia worked behind the scenes to scuttle any agreement on targets, apparently enjoying its role keeping Europe dependent on Russian energy supplies and thus politically weakened.

Furthermore, the really “inconvenient truth” is that the U.S. is doing better at controlling its own emissions than are the Europeans, and that no country is really willing to take on the economic damage that an emissions-restriction regime would cause. A whiff of hypocrisy is in the verbal wind. It is convenient for them to blame the U.S. for their own failings.

So what next? The Bush government has called a conference of the major emitting nations for Hawaii next month to work on flexible and voluntary targets, tailored to different nations’ needs. The E.U. at Bali threatened to boycott the Hawaii meeting unless the U.S. agreed at Bali to targets. That blackmail failed, and now we’ll see whether the E.U. people will show up in Hawaii or risk being left out of this process, parallel to the U.N. track, which may produce some important agreements.

As for the “main track” U.N. process, it goes on, of course: next stop Copenhagen 2009.

P.S. to my blog post on the Pope’s World Day of Peace address: Papal statements are known for careful nuance and balance, and this one was no exception. The Daily Mail report stressed only one side. Benedict did acknowledge the climate problem and call for addressing it. But he also made, more importantlin my judgment, the points I stressed: that hyperbolic alarmism is dangerous, that ideology should not override science, and that environmental decisions should not override real human need.

P.S. #2, on reading statistics with a viewpoint: The World Meteorological Organization reports that 2007 was one of the ten hottest years on record, most of those ten years being in the last decade. But it also seems that 2007 is on track to be the coldest year since 1998, the year of the large El Niño surge. And those who watch the sun’s behavior report a quiescent period with no sun spots, possibly presaging the return of a cooler earth – even, heaven forbid, a period like the “little ice age” of the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. Naturally, no mention of this happened at Bali.

Source:  http://www.firstthings.com/blog/

Julia

Benedict the Science Guy Challenges ManBearPig

From the Cranmer blog in the UK, which is usually very snarky about Popes and such.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Pope: Global warming assessment must be based on ‘science not dogma’

It is something of a topsy-turvy world when a pope tells us to base our thinking on ‘science, not dogma’, and doubtless an aggrieved Galileo may feel somewhat vindicated, but here is a man on the world stage who is prepared express doubts about the ‘Green’ movement which is just as dogmatic in its assumptions as any religion. This declaration from the Pope is consistent with the man’s propensity to favour the virtues of rationalism, which he has already applied to interfaith dialogue between Christians and Muslims.

The Roman Catholic Church is not anti-scientific. While its treatment of Galileo may have been acknowledged to have been ‘an error’, Copernicus dedicated his famous heliocentric work, ‘On the Revolution of the Celestial Orbs’, to Pope Paul III. Copernicus then bequeathed this work to Andreas Osiander, a Lutheran clergyman who knew that Protestant reaction to it would be negative, since Luther himself was not favourable to the new theory. And Kepler also found opposition among his fellow Protestants for his heliocentric views, yet found a welcome reception among a group of Jesuits who were noted for their astronomical interests.

And it is the Pope of Rome who is now challenging the orthodoxy of the political aspects of the global warming movement around the world. That, of course, is true acknowledgement of the scientific method: a world apart from the hysteria surrounding the half-baked theories of pseudo-scientists and ignoramuses like Al Gore. Here we have a pope who is defending the protestants of postmodernity, confronting head-on the climate change ‘prophets of doom’ with the warning that any solutions to global warming ‘must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology’.

He dismisses talk of man-made emissions melting the ice caps as ‘scare-mongering’, and demands that assessment ‘be carried out prudently, in dialogue with experts and people of wisdom, uninhibited by ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions, and above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the well-being of all while respecting environmental balances’.

And now there has been a ‘breakthrough’ in Bali, with the administration of President Bush apparently conceding on the matter and now joined by Australia’s new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, there is an inexorable spiritual drive to inculcate the population of the world with the worship of Mother Earth, to indoctrinate with the dogma of Gaia, against which the Pope alone declares: ‘Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me.’

posted by Cranmer at 12:10 PM

Source:  http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2007/12/it-is-something-of-topsy-turvy-world.html

Smart guy, that Benedict.

Julia

Pope Benedict XVI

Pope Benedict XVI does not believe in the Goracle and the New Church of Manbearpig.  He says that we should let the scientists debate over Manbearpig, not Politicians.

The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom

By SIMON CALDWELL – More by this author »
Last updated at 14:48pm on 12th December 2007

Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change
prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming
must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology.

 

The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that
fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave
of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scare-mongering.

The German-born Pontiff said that while some concerns may be
valid it was vital that the international community based its policies
on science rather than the dogma of the environmentalist movement.

His remarks will be made in his annual message for World Peace
Day on January 1, but they were released as delegates from all over the
world convened on the Indonesian holiday island of Bali for UN climate
change talks.

The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the
environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and
plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind.

 

Adrift: Polar bears on melting iceberg

"Humanity today is rightly concerned about the ecological balance of
tomorrow," he said in the message entitled "The Human Family, A
Community of Peace".

"It is important for assessments in this regard to be carried
out prudently, in dialogue with experts and people of wisdom,
uninhibited by ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions, and
above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable
development capable of ensuring the well-being of all while respecting
environmental balances.

"If the protection of the environment involves costs, they
should be justly distributed, taking due account of the different
levels of development of various countries and the need for solidarity
with future generations.

"Prudence does not mean failing to accept responsibilities and
postponing decisions; it means being committed to making joint
decisions after pondering responsibly the road to be taken."—Daily Mail

What about Consensus

Looks like the founder of the Weather Channel has not bought into the New Church of Global Warming that the Goracle has founded. 

H/T to GOP & College

The Goracle is still looking for Manbearpig:

By John Coleman

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly
offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists
with environmental and political motives manipulated long term
scientific data to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other
scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle
to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally
slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government
steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon
they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed
up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to
create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening
environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to
their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been
accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the
Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers
and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmentally
conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to
counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minute documentary
segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political
positions of either party. However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate
Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a
religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the
science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I
am telling you Global Warming is a non-event, a manufactured crisis and
a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe a me, a
mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy
Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous
scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am
correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on
climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed
by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and
rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global
Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the
temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super
storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to
realize we have been duped. The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles
and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any
climate changes underway. I strongly believe that the next twenty years
are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a
warming trend.

ICECAP

Crossposted at Grizzly Groundswell

 

Manbearpig is a myth

Algore won the Oscar and Nobel Peace Prize because of his little fakeumentary about Manbearpig.  Today’s Times has a good article by David Bellamy about why he is proud to be called a "Heretic" about Manbearpig.

Today’s forecast: yet another blast of hot air

Why I would rather be called a heretic on global warming

David Bellamy

Am I worried about man-made global warming? The answer is “no” and “yes”.

No, because the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction has come up against an
“inconvenient truth”. Its research shows that since 1998 the average
temperature of the planet has not risen, even though the concentration of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has continued to increase.

Yes, because the self-proclaimed consensus among scientists has detached
itself from the questioning rigours of hard science and become a political
cause. Those of us who dare to question the dogma of the global-warming
doomsters who claim that C not only stands for carbon but also for climate
catastrophe are vilified as heretics or worse as deniers.

I am happy to be branded a heretic because throughout history heretics have
stood up against dogma based on the bigotry of vested interests. But I don’t
like being smeared as a denier because deniers don’t believe in facts. The
truth is that there are no facts that link the concentration of atmospheric
carbon dioxide with imminent catastrophic global warming. Instead of facts,
the advocates of man-made climate change trade in future scenarios based on
complex and often unreliable computer models.

Name-calling may be acceptable in politics but it should have no place in
science; indeed, what is happening smacks of McCarthyism, witch-hunts and
all. Scientific understanding, however, is advanced by robust, reasoned
argument based on well-researched data. So I turn to simple sets of data
that are already in the public domain.

The last peak global temperatures were in 1998 and 1934 and the troughs of low
temperature were around 1910 and 1970. The second dip caused pop science and
the media to cry wolf about an impending, devastating Ice Age. Our end was
nigh!

Then, when temperatures took an upward swing in the 1980s, the scaremongers
changed their tune. Global warming was the new imminent catastrophe.

But the computer model – called “hockey stick” – that predicted the
catastrophe of a frying planet proved to be so bent that it “disappeared”
from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s armoury of argument in
2007. It was bent because the historical data it used to predict the future
dated from only the 1850s, when the world was emerging from the Little Ice
Age. Little wonder that temperatures showed an upward trend.

In the Sixties I used to discuss climate change with my undergraduates at
Durham University. I would point to the plethora of published scientific
evidence that showed the cyclical nature of change – and how, for instance,
the latest of a string of ice ages had affected the climate, sea levels and
tree lines around the world. Thank goodness the latest crop of glaciers and
ice sheets began to wane in earnest about 12,000 years ago; this gave
Britain a window of opportunity to lead the industrial revolution.

The Romans grew grapes in York and during the worldwide medieval warm period –
when civilizations blossomed across the world – Nordic settlers farmed
lowland Greenland (hence its name) and then got wiped out by the Little Ice
Age that lasted roughly from the 16th century until about 1850.

There is no escaping the fact that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere has been rising for 150 years – and very uniformly since the
1950s. Yet the temperature has not increased in step with CO2. Not only have
there been long periods of little change in temperature, but also the
year-to-year oscillations are totally unrelated to CO2 change. What is more,
the trend lines of glacial shortening and rise in sea level have shown no
marked change since the big increase in the use of fossil fuels since 1950.

How can this be explained unless there are other factors at work overriding
the greenhouse effect of CO2? There are, of course, many to be found in the
peer-reviewed literature: solar cycles, cosmic rays, cloud control and those
little rascals, such as El Niño and La Niña, all of which are played down or
even ignored by the global-warming brigade.

Let’s turn to Al Gore’s doom-laden Oscar-winning documentary An
Inconvenient Truth. First, what is the point of scaring the families of the
world with tales that polar bears are heading for extinction? Last year
Mitchell Taylor, of the US National Biological Service, stated that “of the
13 populations of polar bears in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in
number. They are not going extinct, or even appear to be affected at
present.”

Why create alarm about a potential increase in the spread of malaria thanks to
rising temperatures when this mosquito-borne disease was a major killer of
people in Britain and northern Russia throughout the Little Ice Age?

Despite the $50 billion spent on greenwashing propaganda, the sceptics and
their inconvenient questions are beginning to make their presence felt.

A recent survey of Klaus-Martin Schulte, of Kings College Hospital, of all
papers on the subject of climate change that were published between 2004 and
February of 2007 found that only 7 per cent explicitly endorsed a “so-called
consensus” position that man-made carbon dioxide is causing catastrophic
global warming. What is more, James Lovelock, the author and green guru, has
changed his mind: he recently stated that neither Earth nor the human race
is doomed.

Yes, melting sea ice around Greenland has recently opened up the fabled North
West passage. And, yes, the years 2006 and 2007 have seen massive flooding
in Europe. However, a quick dip into the records of the Royal Society –
which ranked alongside Dr Lovelock as arch doomsters, before his change of
mind – shows that dramatic fluctuations happened long before the infernal
combustion engine began spewing out carbon dioxide.

The year 1816 went down in history as the “year without a summer”, thanks to
the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia that veiled much of the world
with dust, screening out the Sun. Yet in 1817, while still in the grip of
the Little Ice Age, the Royal Society was so worried that 2,000 square
leagues of sea ice around Greenland had disappeared within two years, and
massive flooding was taking place in Germany, that its president wrote to
the Admiralty advising of the necessity of an expedition to find out what
was the source of this new heat.

Perhaps, when similar things are happening 190 years later, the Royal Society
should accept that anthropogenic carbon dioxide is unlikely to be the main –
or only – driver of “global warming”.

Times Online

submit_url = ‘http://stix1972.typepad.com/stix_blog/2007/10/manbearpig-is-a.html’;
button_type =1;

How a Brit Sees Our Home-Grown Anti-Americans

Really great piece in The Times of London.

October 19, 2007

The US is a great place to be anti-American

Gerard Baker

Anti-Americanism is on the wane at last. All over the world, Americans are being fêted once again as farsighted, liberating heroes.

Al Gore has won a Nobel Peace Prize, an Oscar and an Emmy, the triple crown of recognition from the self-adoring keepers of bien-pensant, elite liberal, global orthodoxy. Michael Moore is treated like a prophet in Cannes and Venice, as he peddles his tales of an America that poisons its poor, sends its blacks off to war and shoots itself. Whenever a loquacious Dixie Chick or a contumacious Sean Penn utters some excoriating remark about the depravity of his or her own country, audiences around the world nod their heads in sympathetic agreement. Bill Clinton, of course, is a god. Though protocol dictates that he may not say things that are too unkind about the country he once led, a nod and a wink will suffice.

It has always amused me that the same people who denounce America as a seething cesspit of blind obscurantist bigotry can’t see the irony that America itself produces its own best critics. When there’s a scab to be picked on the American body politic, no one does it with more loving attention, more rigorous focus on the detail, than Americans themselves.

It has always been this way. The fiercest and most effective opponents of US foreign policy in the 1960s were not the students in Paris or the Politburo in North Vietnam. They were Jane Fonda, Bobby Kennedy and Marvin Gaye.  

Today I can only laugh when I see the popular portrayal of George Bush’s America in much of the international media. Supposedly serious commentators will say, without evident irony, that free speech is under attack, that Bush’s wiretapping, Guantanamo-building, tourist-fingerprinting regime is terrifying Americans into quiet, desperate acquiescence in the country’s proliferating crimes.

The truth is that America not only harbours the most eloquent and noisy anti-Americans in its own breast, it provides a safe haven for people to come from all over the world to condemn it.

Take a stroll through almost any American university campus and you will hear a cacophony of voices in a hundred different languages, slamming everything America does, from fast food to hedge-fund capitalism. For years one of America’s most celebrated academics was Edward Said, the Palestinian agitator-cum-professor, who lived high on the hog at Columbia University, near the pinnacle of the American intellectual establishment, dispensing his wisdom about US wrongs in the Middle East.

Hollywood is the global mecca for angry denouncers of everything American. From all over they come, forcing themselves to live in their green-lawned mansions carefully tended by cheap migrant labour from south of the Border. This autumn, unsuspecting Americans (and everyone else, of course) will be treated to an especially unsettling stream of antiwar, anti-American propaganda, much of it produced in Hollywood by foreigners – such as this weekend’s likely box-office hit, Rendition.

And where would the world get its daily media diet of horror stories about what a ghastly country the place is if its reporters weren’t all comfortably pavilioned inside America, where they make a generous living happily devouring the hand that generously feeds them?

It’s true that self-criticism is always more effective than an outsider’s observations. Let’s be honest, how much real moral weight do Vladimir Putin or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad carry when they decry American motives and actions? All but the most unhinged of America’s critics know, deep down, in a part of the brain they try not to consult, that whatever they may think of the Bushitler in Washington, they don’t feel comfortable agreeing with the ex-KGB hatchet man of the Kremlin or the Holocaust-denying Dr Strangelove sitting astride his Islamist bomb. It sounds so much better when Al Gore or Michael Moore says it.

But ask yourself why that is. Isn’t it because they know that only American criticism really carries legitimacy? Only a country that enthusiastically and self-woundingly honours Voltaire’s old dictum about free speech can really be trusted to cast judgment on anything.

There’s another, more important aspect to the world’s affection for those in America who are most critical of it. The Americans who win global approbation in Oslo or at the UN are not simply critics of current American policy. They want to construct an international system that will for ever prevent the US from pursuing its own objectives, a system designed to dilute, counterbalance and constrain America’s ability to govern itself. They prefer a world in which American democracy is subordinated to a kind of global government, rule by a global elite, tasked to make decisions on everyone’s behalf in the name of multilateralism.

Al Gore wants the US to give up its economic autonomy and submit to rule by binding international obligations to curb its carbon emissions. Some of the Democratic candidates for the presidency want to tie down the American Gulliver under a web of global treaties. The British Government, if recent speeches by ministers are to be believed, is now apparently seriously committed to the idea that only the UN has the legitimacy to determine how nations should behave. In other words, that a system that gives vetoes to China and Russia and honours the human rights contributions of countries such as Syria or North Korea should be accorded a full role in the promotion of the dignity of mankind.

There’s a larger irony in all this. Even as the US demonstrates the openness of its own society, its unrivalled capacity for self-examination and self-correction, a free system based on the absolute authority of the rule of law, it is told it must submit itself to the views of Moscow, Beijing, and Brussels.

Fortunately, while the American system may be forgivingly tolerant of people with wild and dangerous ideas, it doesn’t generally let them run the country.

Source:  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article2689746.ece

As usual, the combox is fun to read.   We have a lot more friends in Europe than we realize. 

Julia 

submit_url = ‘http://stix1972.typepad.com/stix_blog/2007/10/how-a-brit-sees.html’;
button_type = 1;

Al Gore Debates Global Warming

Well, sort of.
Her is a video of ALGore and then some Climate experts that have studied climate a little more than the Goracle and his disciples.

submit_url = ‘http://stix1972.typepad.com/stix_blog/2007/10/al-gore-debates.html’;
button_type = 1;

 

AlGore’s speech forthe Nobel Peace Prize

via Question Authority?  Question Hillary

"Could you move this mic a little closer to my cheese fries plate? Thanks.

First,
I would like to welcome the distinguished Nobel panel, recent honorees
and nominees, guys that re-painted my private jet in Fort Worth at the
American Airlines service depot, and of course Mrs. Arafat and her many
hybrid camel riding chillins in greater PLO Land if not more
specifically Hollywood itself.

It has been said and seconded
that temperatures are rising on Mars and Saturn, just as they are now
rising on planet dirt. While there may be complete truth to that, not
for one second ever doubt my willingness to forgo inconvenient
mathematical facts but instead transect the over-riding legal authority
which praise Buddhist temples every precinct may indeed now allow our
dear Red Army DNC campaign contributors to continue per their daily
construction of 1930’s era coal-fired plants, as I continually blame
Bush for Chinese leaded toys, AIDS spas, the Jena 6-pack, and the
dollar menu at Burger King which cuts into the available meat supply
for yet to be named fat ass media whore clowns such as meesa.

No,
I will not be running for President of the Teamsters. After having lost
the keys to blocking the military overseas vote in 2000 and all that
goes along with not being a really good Clixon, I will instead digest
myself to the flexible fisting information flow, which remains the
hallmark of loon liberals and other leftist slackers everywhere, not so
much as a follow-up piece to my latest bogus fluff but more so the
fingering of those that would have you believe I actually left Vietnam
after six months of my own accord instead of old senator Daddy’s.

Again, prize be to sweet Allah, fuel up the latest petrol plane, and on to Toronto for group think fondue!"

submit_url = ‘http://stix1972.typepad.com/stix_blog/2007/10/algores-speech-.html’;
button_type = 1;